Date: Sun, 20 Sep 1998 21:09:34 +0200 (MET DST) From: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> To: asaddi@philosophysw.com (Allan Saddi) Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Yet more natd problems Message-ID: <199809201909.VAA00675@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.02A.9809201231150.15926-100000@shell2.ba.best.com> from "Allan Saddi" at Sep 20, 98 12:31:30 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> This seems to be a popular topic on -stable lately. ;)
yes, but hopefully all your feedback will be useful...
it's puzzling that the your divert rule is not matched
by packets which do appear on ed1... this makes me think
that i am not properly resetting one of the static vars
which control divert... perhaps it would be worthwhile
instrumenting (e.g. putting a printf) in the section
of ip_fw.c near line 707 that says
/* Ignore divert/tee rule if socket port is "ignport" */
...
- if (f->fw_divert_port == ignport)
+ if (f->fw_divert_port == ignport) {
+ printf("xxx ignored port %d\n", ignport);
continue ;
+ } else {
+ printf("xxx valid divert rule\n");
i'd say you shouldn't get the "ignored" msg twice in a row...
thanks
luigi
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199809201909.VAA00675>