From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Fri Jul 24 07:20:58 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E5AB9A75A4 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 07:20:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru) Received: from zxy.spb.ru (zxy.spb.ru [195.70.199.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DDBE1CC1 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 07:20:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru) Received: from slw by zxy.spb.ru with local (Exim 4.84 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ZIXHo-000Geq-6y; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 10:20:52 +0300 Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 10:20:52 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov To: d@delphij.net Cc: Stari Karp , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd downgrade Message-ID: <20150724072052.GF43740@zxy.spb.ru> References: <1437693686.78236.2.camel@yandex.com> <55B17DEB.6070302@delphij.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55B17DEB.6070302@delphij.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: slw@zxy.spb.ru X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zxy.spb.ru); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 07:20:58 -0000 On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 04:51:07PM -0700, Xin Li wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > On 07/23/15 16:21, Stari Karp wrote: > > Hi! > > > > I had a problems with FreeBSD 10.2-BETA2. I used freebsd-update > > ugrade and update FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE. Is it possible to downgrade > > BETA2 to 10.1-RELEASE with freebsd-update upgrade -r 10.1-RELEASE, > > please? > > It's not supported (because you may be running binaries that depends > on new kernel). > > What kind of problems did you have? Please let re@ know so we can get > them fixed. For me -- degradate network performance, about 30%. I am do verification now, by downgrading kernel.