From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Sep 4 15:40: 4 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D641A37B424 for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2000 15:40:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id PAA74428; Mon, 4 Sep 2000 15:40:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2000 15:40:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200009042240.PAA74428@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Ville Eerola Subject: Re: ports/20716: [PATCH] update port: mail/fetchmail to 5.5.0 Reply-To: Ville Eerola Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/20716; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Ville Eerola To: Peter Pentchev Cc: Maxim Sobolev , freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/20716: [PATCH] update port: mail/fetchmail to 5.5.0 Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2000 01:39:17 +0300 (EEST) Peter Pentchev writes: > Well yeah, I thought of contacting the maintainter too, a day or two > after submitting the PR :\ No answer so far.. maybe this thread will > elicit some reply? :) > > On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 05:02:27PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > What the MAINTAINER think about that? Hmmm... I seem to have missed the PR. However, I checked the fetchmail www-site, ad it appears that there is already a new version available (5.5.1), which fixes the problem that you fixed in a new patch. I would prefer the port to be upgraded to 5.5.1 in order to avoid extra patch files in the FreeBSD ports repository... Could you try the newer version and see if it works for you without the new patch? It should be a simple matter of new checksum and distfile name change in the Makefile. Regards, Ville -- Ville Eerola | Powered by ve@sci.fi | FreeBSD To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message