From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Oct 22 05:48:04 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id FAA26603
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 22 Oct 1997 05:48:04 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers)
Received: from word.smith.net.au (word.smith.net.au [202.0.75.3])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id FAA26571
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 22 Oct 1997 05:47:47 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from mike@word.smith.net.au)
Received: from word.smith.net.au (localhost.smith.net.au [127.0.0.1])
	by word.smith.net.au (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA00847;
	Wed, 22 Oct 1997 22:13:17 +0930 (CST)
Message-Id: <199710221243.WAA00847@word.smith.net.au>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97
To: Darren Reed <darrenr@cyber.com.au>
cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: more struct ifnet move lossage. 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 22 Oct 1997 22:15:50 +1000."
             <199710221215.WAA06516@plum.cyber.com.au> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997 22:13:15 +0930
From: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> 
> I'm curious...does tcpdump still compile on -current, `out of the box' ?

src/usr.sbin/tcpdump, src/contrib/tcpdump.  And look ma, no diffs.

> (Just to state the obvious, you don't compile tcpdump with -DKERNEL)

Speaking of stating the obvious; you don't expect to have the 
kernel-private data structures that are the subject of so much 
vitriolic hatred to stay put, do you?

All of Terry's comments on a procedural interface are 100% on the mark. 
If you don't like the grief that the structure changes are causing you, 
now is the time to participating in producing a *BETTER* interface.

mike