Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2006 10:39:49 -0500 From: Francisco Reyes <lists@stringsutils.com> To: Marc =?ISO-8859-1?B?Ry4=?= Fournier <scrappy@hub.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cacti (Was: Re: "Load Balancing": How Busy are the servers?) Message-ID: <cone.1136216389.756068.27034.1000@zoraida.natserv.net> References: <20051227211433.J1087@ganymede.hub.org> <cone.1136049494.118589.27817.1000@zoraida.natserv.net> <20060101145325.X1088@ganymede.hub.org> <cone.1136146236.889316.12360.1000@zoraida.natserv.net> <20060102013941.A1088@ganymede.hub.org> <cone.1136181284.147435.17331.1000@zoraida.natserv.net> <20060102020223.T1088@ganymede.hub.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Marc G. Fournier writes: > You can setup "Graph Trees", so you can group Graphs together .. ie. all > the CPU Usage graphs for all (or groups of) servers, so that you can > compare them ... Great report. Have you seen anything yet about disk performance? That would be very usefull too... specially for people who use rsync. I have found that rsync can do significant amount of disk I/O with very little CPU utilization.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cone.1136216389.756068.27034.1000>