From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Dec 5 15:02:46 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A305D47DF70 for ; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 15:02:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "troutmask", Issuer "troutmask" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CpCVY4glHz3rJD for ; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 15:02:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 0B5F2h8C014028 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 5 Dec 2020 07:02:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 0B5F2h5c014027; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 07:02:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2020 07:02:43 -0800 From: Steve Kargl To: Mark Millard Cc: FreeBSD ports Subject: Re: DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=llvm=90 ignored? Message-ID: <20201205150243.GA13965@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <4F024E2C-3657-4FB9-A55B-6FA445EDD21B.ref@yahoo.com> <4F024E2C-3657-4FB9-A55B-6FA445EDD21B@yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F024E2C-3657-4FB9-A55B-6FA445EDD21B@yahoo.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4CpCVY4glHz3rJD X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="No valid SPF, No valid DKIM" header.from=washington.edu (policy=none); spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu has no SPF policy when checking 128.95.76.21) smtp.mailfrom=sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; DMARC_POLICY_SOFTFAIL(0.10)[washington.edu : No valid SPF, No valid DKIM,none]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[128.95.76.21:from]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[1.000]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[128.95.76.21:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[yahoo.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:73, ipnet:128.95.0.0/16, country:US]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2020 15:02:46 -0000 On Sat, Dec 05, 2020 at 01:18:34AM -0800, Mark Millard wrote: > Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask.apl.washington.edu wrote on: > > > > Well, I guess that pretty much kills LLVM_DEFAULT for any > > modern hardware (even a 8 year old laptop) that uses drm > > unless a user wants base-system llvm, llvm90, and llvm10 > > installed. One will certainly be able to compile any > > c/c++ thrown ones way. > > LLVM's API seems to be unstable enough from LLVM release to > LLVM release that maintaining many-release build compatibility > for projects using the LLVM API is not all that common. I'm well aware the llvm API instability, which comes back to the irrelevance of LLVM_DEFAULT. Someday llvm may get it's act together. -- Steve