From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 29 17:49:49 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79141FC for ; Wed, 29 May 2013 17:49:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pa0-f46.google.com (mail-pa0-f46.google.com [209.85.220.46]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57B1BC37 for ; Wed, 29 May 2013 17:49:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id fa1so2090966pad.5 for ; Wed, 29 May 2013 10:49:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=snmtyLgVTcRNRgoLOnDwWFeMRare2qtjFEbxyRGQPFU=; b=CTo0BFkXvyJani0P4YBMjkvRr/cX6xQp2A27jqvcCDtdYMm/Q7CcaAQFCJj770S+Tn aqQxkjr3y5UdjuiOHT3PbQCw0o2k2Nstnc18JYW0Erdnv8qKna405Jqsv/yo036678Ew uDlvKqIhUitMYiQfo1GVziriA7wHWa+GAi2WunwZOLlCDi9Ax1hm4/loIuQ2eInddcMU 0sTnS9EJIjD6XUPCXz7PqIdKmpKi9vb5fB+o/FBPJWf2X3q9VuB3/d8RhAgCrP4eODA5 zGpVCPJ5TfZKjAsPeBdK9YGGBCgy8AXp1MZm1UXD46ttswNf6JehWsWxokexBv40FoF+ +upA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.66.102.3 with SMTP id fk3mr4441671pab.192.1369849782948; Wed, 29 May 2013 10:49:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.31.195 with HTTP; Wed, 29 May 2013 10:49:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1369558712.96152.YahooMailNeo@web165006.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <1369644392.92027.YahooMailNeo@web165003.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 12:49:42 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: "swap" partition leads to instability? From: Adam Vande More To: jb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 17:49:49 -0000 On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 6:19 AM, jb wrote: > - overcommitment of memory (a bluff asking to be punished by OOM killer) No self respecting Unix has an OOM by default. > - OOM killer Are you suggesting FreeBSD does this crap? > Besides, they allow sloppy/dangerous programming. Yup, in the kernel. -- Adam Vande More