From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 3 14:27:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9976116A41F; Thu, 3 Nov 2005 14:27:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from ns1.jnielsen.net (ns1.jnielsen.net [69.55.238.237]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28F1443D5E; Thu, 3 Nov 2005 14:27:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from localhost (ns1 [69.55.238.237]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.jnielsen.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id jA3ER6XC038157; Thu, 3 Nov 2005 06:27:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) From: John Nielsen To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 09:27:02 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <075001c5dff5$e859fbc0$8adb7bd1@icarz.com> <20051103122636.S66191@fledge.watson.org> <20051103140316.GL63539@ip.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <20051103140316.GL63539@ip.net.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511030927.02716.lists@jnielsen.net> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.87, clamav-milter version 0.87 on ns1.jnielsen.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Robert Watson , dick hoogendijk Subject: Re: Fw: GENERIC and DEFAULTS X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 14:27:14 -0000 On Thursday 03 November 2005 09:03 am, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 12:27:21PM +0000, Robert Watson wrote: > > On Thu, 3 Nov 2005, dick hoogendijk wrote: > > >Sure, but I think it's the *syntax* that matters here? options -> > > >nooptions / i486_cpu -> no??? It's OK to leave GENERIC alone, but HOW > > >are things switched off? > > > > It appears to be an ommission in the file format. I've e-mailed > > Ruslan, who implemented nodevice and nooption, to suggest that he also > > add nocpu. I wonder if there are other missed syntactic bits of note. > > I've committed a code that implements the "nocpu" directive, FWIW. How about "nomakeoptions"? Or is there already a way to do the equivalent? I just tried to rewrite my custom kernel using GENERIC as a starting point and didn't know how to override/remove the "makeoptions DEBUG=-g" line. JN