From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 8 17:05:07 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCD5216A4B3 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2003 17:05:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (u173n10.eastlink.ca [24.224.173.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8683643FDD for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2003 17:05:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 917BA344A7; Wed, 8 Oct 2003 21:03:48 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EC1B343C5 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2003 21:03:48 -0300 (ADT) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 21:03:48 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20031008210133.K759@ganymede.hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Dual Opteron Server with -STABLE ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 00:05:07 -0000 Is there a current opinion on this? I heard that costs have come down to 'close to dual xeon' prices, but is it safe to run -STABLE on it? Other then memory allocation above 4g, are we seeing any benefits right now with running this? Or are we dealin with 'running 32 bit apps on a 64 bit arch' still?