From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 25 05:43:34 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BC29701 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 05:43:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@sohara.org) Received: from uk1rly2283.eechost.net (relay01a.mail.uk1.eechost.net [217.69.40.75]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46B9D1032 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 05:43:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [31.186.37.179] (helo=smtp.marelmo.com) by uk1rly2283.eechost.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UVExp-0003o8-Lv for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 06:43:25 +0100 Received: from [192.168.63.1] (helo=steve.marelmo.com) by smtp.marelmo.com with smtp (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1UVExw-000HjZ-Oq for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 05:43:32 +0000 Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 06:43:32 +0100 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD-update? Message-Id: <20130425064332.4f15a20a6a46dade5aa9a0e4@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <5178A647.4030302@herveybayaustralia.com.au> References: <201304242307.r3ON7AEg039368@chilled.skew.org> <201304242232170093.02EE4C98@sentry.24cl.com> <20130425044744.3ebda15f.freebsd@edvax.de> <201304242332000938.0324FC0A@sentry.24cl.com> <5178A647.4030302@herveybayaustralia.com.au> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.24.17; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Auth-Info: 15567@permanet.ie (plain) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 05:43:34 -0000 On Thu, 25 Apr 2013 13:43:03 +1000 Da Rock wrote: > Interesting. My only observation was that sysctl is supposed to be the > 'system' database where all queries relate to. It is supposed to display > everything about the system; therefore any of these data bits should be > fixed here first. Anything else would be a 'feature' :) That would be nice - one way to achieve that would be to add a writable oid for patch level and not bump newvers.sh for patches. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith