From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 10 21:24:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CF571065674 for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 21:24:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhellenthal@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06B618FC13 for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 21:24:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwg5 with SMTP id 5so2047046qwg.13 for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 14:24:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=okXs+flvkDhA2T0uhB+zOeTp9dCwjTo813o4pqjSf34=; b=oB/B2fOlv6A5CIORikwZh3yelgyHkkcvGZSg93VaFcfA8RtaQ04xz6r7fdQ+0gm4IW 0daXxO+TRnVaL9bkqZP+KxrGeqfhl41H2L2LbcR/1C69QqHGhmXJESJbo1XKmWqfNtN4 zj25/anAf3wj3BQGmCjDPtLWpSE0o+Gr281LM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=Tv66XbN6H/JIfEl35GQqD1sMxJdjrNr1Pv+8fZPnY1NPr6xwV8lbPARNKYuIE4h1RD B1Ui+6hR+o5jyYwLMEgicNlS5FzwtV9FGIbEx1bsOjTWPZ7GVsYb5je/qB115VXB0sWl Vipy5EeRRbaqGBewUlIVfF3qsipvC6sd2tZ2g= Received: by 10.229.11.8 with SMTP id r8mr852431qcr.236.1284153884128; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 14:24:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from centel.dataix.local (adsl-99-181-137-20.dsl.klmzmi.sbcglobal.net [99.181.137.20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t1sm3162537qcs.21.2010.09.10.14.24.41 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 10 Sep 2010 14:24:42 -0700 (PDT) Sender: "J. Hellenthal" Message-ID: <4C8AA218.8090104@DataIX.net> Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 17:24:40 -0400 From: jhell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100908 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Graham Todd References: <20100831215915.GE1932@garage.freebsd.pl> <20100902214823.GB2542@garage.freebsd.pl> <4C811954.5040602@3mail4.co.uk> <20100903170241.GF1780@garage.freebsd.pl> <4C8232C6.9020108@DataIX.net> <4C8294B7.3010507@bellanet.org> <20100908090842.GA87388@roberto-al.eurocontrol.fr> <4C878B9A.2000909@bellanet.org> In-Reply-To: <4C878B9A.2000909@bellanet.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS v28 is ready for wider testing. X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 21:24:45 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 09/08/2010 09:11, Graham Todd wrote: > On 09/08/10 05:08, Ollivier Robert wrote: >> According to Graham Todd: >>> Thanks to you and other devs for all your careful work integrating ZFS >>> into FreeBSD. It seems amazing that the patch for v28 *almost* even >>> applies to 8-STABLE. >> >> Do you think you could generate a 8-STABLE patch or at least tell us where >> it is failling please? > > thanks to jhell,v - who has already has attempted this and reported back :) :-) > > see: http://bit.ly/d20tML and > > lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2010-September/019576.html > > "only 14 of the 293 files that were changed had rejects against a stable/8 > that was patched to ZFSv15 + metaslab_v2 + abe_stat_rrwlock" > > I was unable to quite that far - I think because I applied the earlier > patches in the wrong order. But I am impressed that adding a patch from > CURRENT to go from ZFSv15 to ZFSv28 on the STABLE branch was that close to > applying. Just an update to the above, I was planning on getting to this sooner but currently have higher ordered tasks to accomplish first. If I do happen to get around to it I will put a patchset up somewhere for trial. You should be advised that if this does happen and you upgrade your pool + kernel there is a possibility that 8-STABLE will never see these changes officially so you will be left to your own demise or to upgrade to a 9-CURRENT system in order to have a supported source tree with the zfsv28 patch once that gets in there. With the above 'stated', this is why it has not been my highest priority right now. Regards, - -- jhell,v -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMiqIYAAoJEJBXh4mJ2FR+dbwH/2l0tUg0TbJrwxJOhEbZmCez kviw4TLRugd3EX/c/Gs3PFlJPaN7dK8PFMpdt3P8ule0Vd/5+b0tAzdiwP58p1g9 AcELf1N83hhwunkVPp5OYW7+dUP7ujhz/tGCdZkKVF3VHx+Tmp4oK3PY6p9yXZuO XZwbSYVq8SeJoZAANbO1/OTQxnCB/N7mCnW4pR09IUnHB4HiYuEuzgkjbWvFbbKR 2yAxLl5JwkKy9maK2E3DVS6icv3DiSGp42s6dp4faSnFbgQrJNpd9LcUbJNiiC0a r+uVgYvo4Wgj8z354CFnXpEct+LKBtXj04ufhzcyvpSoMKm9L1U3u41FeMEwWsE= =AZRS -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----