From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 18 04:40:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AC3D1065670 for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 04:40:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EBD38FC0A for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 04:40:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4I4e2sW002685 for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 04:40:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q4I4e2rV002684; Fri, 18 May 2012 04:40:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Resent-Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 04:40:02 GMT Resent-Message-Id: <201205180440.q4I4e2rV002684@freefall.freebsd.org> Resent-From: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org (GNATS Filer) Resent-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Resent-Reply-To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, Douglas William Thrift Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 269C4106566C; Fri, 18 May 2012 04:38:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from douglas@douglasthrift.net) Received: from slowhand.douglasthrift.net (slowhand.douglasthrift.net [69.55.236.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC1608FC12; Fri, 18 May 2012 04:38:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (laguna.douglasthrift.net [68.6.64.103]) (authenticated bits=0) by slowhand.douglasthrift.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4I4cOie094341 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 17 May 2012 21:38:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from douglas@douglasthrift.net) Message-Id: <201205180438.q4I4cOie094341@slowhand.douglasthrift.net> Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 21:38:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Douglas William Thrift To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.113 Cc: gecko@FreeBSD.org Subject: ports/168091: Port error: USE_FIREFOX doesn't work correctly X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Douglas William Thrift List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 04:40:02 -0000 >Number: 168091 >Category: ports >Synopsis: Port error: USE_FIREFOX doesn't work correctly >Confidential: no >Severity: critical >Priority: high >Responsible: freebsd-ports-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Fri May 18 04:40:01 UTC 2012 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Douglas William Thrift >Release: FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p1 amd64 >Organization: >Environment: System: FreeBSD justonenight.douglasthrift.net 8.3-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p1 #9: Thu May 3 10:57:52 PDT 2012 root@justonenight.douglasthrift.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/FURTHERONUPTHEROAD amd64 >Description: I was working on updating my port www/py-selenium and when I went to make the distinfo for the new distfile, I got the following: ===> py27-selenium-2.21.3 cannot install: unknown Firefox version: firefox-3.6+. *** Error code 1 Stop in /home/douglas/freebsd/www/py-selenium. *** Error code 1 Stop in /home/douglas/freebsd/www/py-selenium. I looked at /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.gecko.mk and discovered that the value 36+ was no longer listed, so much for backward compatibility with ports, but fair enough. Based on this I changed the value of USE_FIREFOX to 10+, but that didn't make things any better: ===> py27-selenium-2.21.3 cannot install: Firefox versions mismatch: firefox-12 is installed and wanted version is firefox-10+. *** Error code 1 Stop in /home/douglas/freebsd/www/py-selenium. *** Error code 1 Stop in /home/douglas/freebsd/www/py-selenium. That definitely doesn't seem right! I tried 12 and 12+ and they both worked okay, but the port should also support the Firefox 10 line. It looks like my port is the only one so far to even use the + functionality so I guess I shouldn't be surprised by this. I'm also a bit puzzled at the choice of 10 rather than 10+ for USE_FIREFOX= yes. >How-To-Repeat: Write a port with USE_FIREFOX set to 10+ and try to build it on a system with Firefox 12 installed. >Fix: >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: