From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Nov  6 13:46:52 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 881B4DEA
 for <stable@freebsd.org>; Tue,  6 Nov 2012 13:46:52 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from vrwmiller@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (mail-lb0-f182.google.com
 [209.85.217.182])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB8A18FC08
 for <stable@freebsd.org>; Tue,  6 Nov 2012 13:46:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-lb0-f182.google.com with SMTP id b5so525529lbd.13
 for <stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 06 Nov 2012 05:46:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
 :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
 bh=yUk+4JDz4WwcH4V6mY6UgdU5pZshw3sNZJH0T+n7gYw=;
 b=bNYJKhgmOaAiwqyf+XtlWFExP6rlApv5oHcNQa4yNdnOUmk9tFpuyxKkjt5YIDhhUQ
 6c3z31YVdBjVoMc3wQ4MUOJnwraLHqpaZiv4oQblJrN0fHemnQthvzI14jnAY92jtEwm
 UgB/uyNj3MBN2B4xJHEUIFL+L/704huvONHmC8zzT9n8EVteu+nsjWl56f3f6QN/jLyf
 wt3ulEqSqCZUvGYkLbiRiE1ovQMtt4UrQ+PLsqnfNIq3Ask7Kq0bnOs3sjBk8LKLSR0z
 LuhZ+8/szqFBVyZxHKarIJcd7Hg/RW1Pm+MAqW0dtuHw930hPNHUtykApdXCb3xoC1m6
 mOKg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.112.102.132 with SMTP id fo4mr529156lbb.111.1352209610531;
 Tue, 06 Nov 2012 05:46:50 -0800 (PST)
Sender: vrwmiller@gmail.com
Received: by 10.112.4.97 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 05:46:50 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAHzLAVGqQZ6Z8kr0cL_7hMDmEtZwDULspYRDsL_Mjq_1oueq2w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201211020214.UAA29489@lariat.net> <20121102091021.23cf9af0@suse3>
 <CAHzLAVGqQZ6Z8kr0cL_7hMDmEtZwDULspYRDsL_Mjq_1oueq2w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 08:46:50 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: S_JMQ2EVmrSzYGB9w6ZKX0MzgfU
Message-ID: <CAHzLAVFSweWnoNa9+4bTmyLeBHAs8vqChnHsJHqmfg3ivbZiqA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.1 stability/robustness?
From: Rick Miller <vmiller@hostileadmin.com>
To: Rainer Duffner <rainer@ultra-secure.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.net>, stable@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 13:46:52 -0000

Someone asked about getting The DL360 G8 to boot to their intel
branded pci NIC, but I cannot find that email :(

At any rate, we removed the Broadcom daughterboard from the system and
insured that the intel PCI NIC (i350) was bootable in the BIOS.

On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 9:56 PM, Rick Miller <vmiller@hostileadmin.com> wrote:

> I have a blog post at
> http://blog.hostileadmin.com/2012/06/14/freebsd-on-hp-proliant-dl360p-g8-servers/
> which touches on this.  I heard as recently as today that the fixes
> for the BCM5719 and 5720 were recently committed to -CURRENT.  It's
> too late for them to be rolled into 9.1.  Not sure if they'll be
> committed to to stable/8 or not, but if so they could make it into
> 8.4-R.

-- 
Take care
Rick Miller