Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 20:43:18 +0200 From: Vincent Jardin <vjardin@wanadoo.fr> To: Harti Brandt <brandt@fokus.fraunhofer.de>, Franky <franky@is.net.pl> Cc: freebsd-atm <freebsd-atm@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Odp: Re: Odp: Re: patm, idt, ipfw - next adentures Message-ID: <200310082043.18878.vjardin@wanadoo.fr> In-Reply-To: <20031008130057.B63940@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> References: <20031007194614.685322304B@arrakis.solutions.net.pl> <20031008130057.B63940@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 08 October 2003 13:06, Harti Brandt wrote: > On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Franky wrote: > > F>> I suppose there is a bad interaction between HARP and IPFW. Can you > F>> tell me what I should need to configure IPFW (the simplest > configuration F>> (I suppose this would be to pass all packets)). > > This runs for more than 24 hourse with the idt driver without a problem= =2E > Could you please switch of polling and look what it does? Franky was using ipfw's pipe. I do not know this feature. ipfw pipe 1 config bw 5000Kbit/s queue 4Kbytes ipfw queue 10 config weight 65 pipe 1 buckets 4096 mask dst-ip 0x0000ffff ipfw queue 11 config weight 35 pipe 1 buckets 4096 mask dst-ip 0x0000ffff ipfw add 510 queue 10 all from 192.168.1.0/26 to any out via x0 ipfw add 511 queue 11 all from not 192.168.1.0/26 to any out via x0 Maybe he could say us what's happened if he removes ipfw ipfw can be inhibited with: sysctl -w net.inet.ip.fw.enable=3D0 or the Kernel can be rebuilt. Regards, Vincent
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200310082043.18878.vjardin>