From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 16:50:08 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE472106564A for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 16:50:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from mail.cksoft.de (mail.cksoft.de [62.111.66.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A07718FC12 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 16:50:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from localhost (amavis.str.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4E5041C6BB; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 17:50:06 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cksoft.de Received: from mail.cksoft.de ([62.111.66.27]) by localhost (amavis.str.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hqtSY0kJa0hS; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 17:50:06 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id 2B5B341C679; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 17:50:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net (maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net [10.111.66.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FBB04448EC; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 16:45:42 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 16:45:42 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> In-Reply-To: <498F0A16.7050108@quip.cz> Message-ID: <20090208164325.I93725@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <20090207174104.Y93725@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <498F0A16.7050108@quip.cz> X-OpenPGP-Key: 0x14003F198FEFA3E77207EE8D2B58B8F83CCF1842 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails now in 7-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 16:50:09 -0000 On Sun, 8 Feb 2009, Miroslav Lachman wrote: Hi, > Can you explain more details about "32bit compat on 64bit, jail v1 compat, > .."? > Is it possible to run 32bit jail in 64bit host and build & run 32bit ports > (marked as i386 only) in it? What is needet to setup 32bit jail in 64bit > host? Running a 32bit userland on a 64bit machine inside a jail had been possible for quite a while; you'll find the instructions for a "perfect" setup with a bit of search. What the above means is that your i386 jail binary will work on amd64 and that your old jail binary from before the update will work on the kernel after the update. jls will not btw. /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb The greatest risk is not taking one.