Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 6 Jun 2003 09:04:22 -0700
From:      "David O'Brien" <dev-null@NUXI.com>
To:        Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Way forward with BIND 8
Message-ID:  <20030606160422.GB82589@dragon.nuxi.com>
In-Reply-To: <20030606024813.Y5414@znfgre.qbhto.arg>
References:  <20030605235254.W5414@znfgre.qbhto.arg> <a06001214bb060a199205@[10.0.1.2]> <20030606024813.Y5414@znfgre.qbhto.arg>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 03:01:02AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Brad Knowles wrote:
> 
> > At 12:09 AM -0700 2003/06/06, Doug Barton wrote:
> >
> > >  FYI, for those wondering why I'm not considering BIND 9 for import, please
> > >  see http://people.freebsd.org/~dougb/whybind8.html
> >
> > 	I might be able to buy your arguments for supporting BIND 8
> > instead of BIND 9 in -STABLE, but not in -CURRENT.
> 
> Regardless of whether I agree with the points you make here or not, the
> FreeBSD development model requires that what we import in -current, for
> the most part, be what we plan to eventually MFC. That factor alone
> eliminates the possibility of importing BIND 9 at this time.

We do not have to strickly ahear to this.  Once I upgraded the -CURRENT
compiler with a major revision change, I certainly didn't later commit a
new minor rev of the previous compiler to -current before committing it
to -stable.

We certainly can't import BIND9 to -STABLE w/o a trip thru -CURRENT.  But
you can certainly upgrade the BIND8 in -STABLE to a newer minor revision
release.

I agree with Brad that we should have BIND9 in -CURRENT.  It is the
latest release, it is the future, we should get it in now while -CURRENT
is still for early adopters to get experience with BIND9.


> Correct, however historically the project has chosen what it wants to be
> "adventurous" about. Using the "tried and true" versions of things in
> src/contrib gives us more flexibility to be "adventurous" in the parts of
> the tree that are generated by the project.

Uh... we've imported early alpha versions of compilers and
assemblers/linkers into -CURRENT before.  We are more adventurous in
-CURRENT.


> However, those who really want to embark on the adventure of testing bind
> 9 in production can do so using the port.

At what point will you finally feel BIND9 is ready for normal use?

-- 
-- David  (obrien@FreeBSD.org)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030606160422.GB82589>