From owner-freebsd-current Thu Feb 25 0: 3:45 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [209.157.86.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0EE814C11 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 1999 00:03:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id AAA01163; Thu, 25 Feb 1999 00:03:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 00:03:15 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <199902250803.AAA01163@apollo.backplane.com> To: "Daniel C. Sobral" Cc: Jos Backus , Dmitrij Tejblum , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: panic: zone: entry not free References: <19990223094120.A97001@hal.mpn.cp.philips.com> <199902230909.MAA01169@tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru> <19990223105939.D97001@hal.mpn.cp.philips.com> <36D329D1.73146EEF@newsguy.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG :Jos Backus wrote: :> :> > That is, INVARIANTS in kernel incompatible with dynamic loading. :> :> Somehow this strikes me as a Bad Thing... : :Invariants is not for the production minded. It is for those who :work with things likely to get broken. Say, for instance, -current. ::-) : :-- :Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) I would disagree with that. Invariants are for people who want their data to be as safe as possible and don't mind eating a little cpu doing extra sanity checks in the kernel. It is something I would almost certainly enable in a production kernel. DIAGNOSTIC, on the otherhand, is something I would only enable in an extreme test environment. :dcs@newsguy.com :dcs@freebsd.org -Matt Matthew Dillon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message