From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Feb 18 22:19:21 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E810816A475
	for <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 22:19:21 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from csaba@beastie.creo.hu)
Received: from beastie.creo.hu (www.creo.hu [217.113.62.14])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CDA913C455
	for <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 22:19:20 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from csaba@beastie.creo.hu)
Received: from beastie.creo.hu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by beastie.creo.hu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m1IMHH1E058582
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 23:17:17 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from csaba@beastie.creo.hu)
Received: (from csaba@localhost)
	by beastie.creo.hu (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id m1IMHHYN058581;
	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 23:17:17 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from csaba)
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 23:17:17 +0100
From: Csaba Henk <csaba-ml@creo.hu>
To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@des.no>
Message-ID: <20080218221716.GI49155@beastie.creo.hu>
References: <slrnfqrp6g.i6j.csaba-ml@beastie.creo.hu>
	<867ihdc34c.fsf@ds4.des.no>
	<20080212190207.GB49155@beastie.creo.hu>
	<86d4r2540f.fsf@ds4.des.no>
	<20080213165923.GD49155@beastie.creo.hu>
	<86zlu493ep.fsf@ds4.des.no>
	<20080214101511.GE49155@beastie.creo.hu>
	<20080214182740.GZ64299@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org>
	<20080218153717.GH49155@beastie.creo.hu>
	<86d4qu43rt.fsf@ds4.des.no>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <86d4qu43rt.fsf@ds4.des.no>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09)
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2
	(beastie.creo.hu [127.0.0.1]);
	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 23:17:18 +0100 (CET)
Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Remove NTFS kernel support
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 22:19:22 -0000

On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 05:40:06PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote:
> Csaba Henk <csaba-ml@creo.hu> writes:
> > Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au> writes:
> > > Csaba Henk <csaba-ml@creo.hu> writes:
> > > > yes, why so? FreeBSD has embraced recently a big chunk of CDDL'd
> > > > code without making much fuss about licensing [...]
> > > If you're talking about either dtrace or ZFS:
> > > [...]
> > > 2) It is not part of the GENERIC system and will remain optional due to
> > >    the license.
> > It smells like apples and oranges to me... GENERIC is the name of the
> > default configuration for the _kernel_, isnt'it?
> 
> Correct.  It was *you* who brought up the issue of CDDL code in the
> kernel.  Peter pointed out, very correctly, that the code in question is
> not included in the default kernel.

Umm, I don't mean to nit-pick, but I thought of the CDDL code in
userspace... Sorry if I was ambiguous.

Csaba