From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Dec  5 17:27:41 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5ACF41B9
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu,  5 Dec 2013 17:27:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.grem.de (outcast.grem.de [213.239.217.27])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9786D1D9B
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu,  5 Dec 2013 17:27:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 15985 invoked by uid 89); 5 Dec 2013 17:20:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO bsd64.grem.de) (mg@grem.de@194.97.158.66)
 by mail.grem.de with ESMTPA; 5 Dec 2013 17:20:58 -0000
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 18:20:58 +0100
From: Michael Gmelin <freebsd@grem.de>
To: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Position independent code and global destructor order (devel/ice)
Message-ID: <20131205182058.5479b1ff@bsd64.grem.de>
In-Reply-To: <20131205170728.GF59496@kib.kiev.ua>
References: <6900C006-2A57-4EAF-B19A-629A85CBA001@FreeBSD.org>
 <20130626210534.GY91021@kib.kiev.ua>
 <A60BFADA-E358-4363-8BED-E154AB327C6B@FreeBSD.org>
 <20130626231741.497f7a9b@bsd64.grem.de>
 <20130626212833.GB91021@kib.kiev.ua>
 <20130627015602.7a437aad@bsd64.grem.de>
 <51CC411C.4060105@FreeBSD.org> <20130627140428.GI91021@kib.kiev.ua>
 <20130827144507.385a552c@bsd64.grem.de>
 <20131130223427.3d95ae7c@bsd64.grem.de>
 <20131205170728.GF59496@kib.kiev.ua>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.18; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.1)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: David Chisnall <theraven@freebsd.org>, Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org>,
 Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>, Matthias Andree <mandree@FreeBSD.org>,
 "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Ports" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 17:27:41 -0000

On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 19:07:28 +0200
Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> wrote:

> If you provided link to the original discussion, it would take much
> less energy and time to refresh the memory.

Forgot to include it, sorry. Thanks for you response and the patch.

> 
> I looked over this, and I think that r211706 can be refined, by only
> calling atexit hooks for 'wrong' dso when the call to __cxa_finalize()
> is from the real dlclose(), as opposed to the process exit.  For me,
> with the world where the patch is applied, your 'major tom' test
> passes.

Makes sense.

> 
> Of course, when dso1 registers __cxa_atexit hook located in dso2, and
> dso2 is unloaded before dso1, the hooks are called in the wrong order
> still, but the only alternatives there are either crash or do not call
> such hooks at all.

Sounds like a good solution. PHP (and similar) crashes are avoided
while clean code isn't affected. I will try the patch in my specific
use case to make sure it works there as well.

-- 
Michael Gmelin