Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 20 May 1998 16:39:38 -0400
From:      "Jason" <kib@poboxes.com>
To:        "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>, "Amancio Hasty" <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Cc:        "Gary Kline" <kline@tera.tera.com>, "Atipa" <freebsd@atipa.com>, <freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: Why we should support Microsoft... 
Message-ID:  <021e01bd842f$694c9d80$023aa8c0@kib.kib.net>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> another problem who's magnitude will be dwarfed by the problems
>> resulting from its "solution" - just where does this stupidity end,
>> anyway?  Did we all just ingest a lot of lead paint chips in the 50's
>> and 60's as children or what? :-)
>>
>
>So what is your suggestion on how should the DOJ treat Microsoft business
>pratice?
>
>
> Amancio


Well here's my opinion to the question even though it was not directed at me
personally

The DOJ should forget this whole Win98/IE4 thing.  MS has a right to ship
what it wants when it wants.

The DOJ should look into things like:
OEM licenses and MS using them to force OEMs to not install or customize
things that consumers want.   I mean its only appropriate that the OS be
customizable by the OEM or the end user....but this does not mean working
with the source or other copyrighted sections of the OS.
Really nothing else the DOJ has said has any legal bearing on what MS has
done.


Jason


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?021e01bd842f$694c9d80$023aa8c0>