From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 28 16:16:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1843916A4DD for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 16:16:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darren@nighttide.net) Received: from olmec.nighttide.net (jasper.nighttide.net [207.5.141.146]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2A9843D67 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 16:16:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from darren@nighttide.net) Received: from olmec.nighttide.net (darren@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olmec.nighttide.net (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7SGGa5G020060 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 12:16:36 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from darren@nighttide.net) Received: from localhost (darren@localhost) by olmec.nighttide.net (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) with ESMTP id k7SGGamU020057 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 12:16:36 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from darren@nighttide.net) X-Authentication-Warning: olmec.nighttide.net: darren owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 12:16:36 -0400 (EDT) From: Darren Henderson To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20060827225631.K82634@hub.org> Message-ID: <20060828120755.R19342@olmec> References: <20060825233420.V82634@hub.org> <20060827230002.GG1149@zaphod.nitro.dk> <20060827205909.K82634@hub.org> <44F23D7A.30604@mawer.org> <20060827221502.56976f1c.rnsanchez@gmail.com> <20060827225631.K82634@hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: BSDStats - What is involved ... ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 16:16:42 -0000 My unsolicited opinion on this would be that anything vaguely "phone home"'ish should only be done through the ports mechanism regardless of whether it is opt-in or not.