From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 22 20:25:12 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9249D490; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 20:25:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x234.google.com (mail-wi0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 039B4180A; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 20:25:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f180.google.com with SMTP id q5so164675wiv.13 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 13:25:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=tbbIap0IqOe7jhLkci0kjBaos6/keXXSUwJlBSN3euM=; b=IKzEhIUlojuSiqt1xytAURXaVZBubT3jtB7NVMGLPDiBN3cATz0rEGeXHIZJVfLFdR s02WLbUkYaMPAblrTukCEm3hq1X6gL3rnqnp7hcteN/VudoyDQU3zV5FA+ucwd7shfsH oMHx54dQEBV3IrfHBBxqR7HxWsG9TdG3qqvWpi5vmTwWtVGp71LdXwxAbOSfB1+UH7ki 6W901keOQ+JQ7FLqF3WF6Ss2ppkkA4BU7DvDMY3VTLM2T5ADTBlYbgTRMx/rRPe2gXTP hvekeLR2QppCR5NA+JT+kq0dIM3a0fvqq95WzNI9moDV4et8JsoECXsmMa1zmTc1jNBl Yq9Q== X-Received: by 10.194.187.50 with SMTP id fp18mr384004wjc.89.1398198310337; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 13:25:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id dg5sm24613109wib.12.2014.04.22.13.25.08 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 22 Apr 2014 13:25:08 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 22:25:06 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Julio Merino Subject: Re: Can fmake be deleted? Message-ID: <20140422202506.GA63561@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, "Simon J. Gerraty" X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 20:25:12 -0000 --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 01:20:46PM -0700, Julio Merino wrote: > Hello, >=20 > The WITHOUT_BMAKE=3Dyes build has been broken for over a month and, as > far as I can tell, only tinderbox noticed... (Should be fixed with a > commit I made yesterday but tinderbox hasn't caught up yet.) >=20 > Question: is there any reason to keep the old fmake around or could it > be deleted along all the MK_BMAKE logic? >=20 At least for the ports side the plan is to drop fmake support as soon as possible. regards, Bapt --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlNW0CIACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EwIRwCdFt/eEZoOa0Gnz55ef7l5ze2i vQcAoIeeKiRG+u3gJAgzAm6N2COw2MLI =L6za -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb--