Date: Wed, 24 Apr 1996 16:45:48 -0400 From: Cat Okita <cat@ghost.uunet.ca> To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@ki.net> Cc: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@GndRsh.aac.dev.com>, davidg@Root.COM, hasty@rah.star-gate.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Intelligent Debugging Tools... Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960424164323.5667g-100000@ghost.uunet.ca> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.93.960424163908.325C-100000@freebsd.ki.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 24 Apr 1996, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > What? Sun/Dec don't use the same SCSI drives? Weird... I think that you must have missed the start of this thread. The question wasn't if drives *could* be terminated on the drive, but rather whether it was a better option to terminate *internally* or *externally*. Typically, the drives which I've used in Sun/Dec machines don't arrive with termination set on the drive - it's set externally. In the PC world, drives usually arrive with termination set on the drive, which becomes an awkward and annoying problem when you start adding SCSI devices. If this still isn't clear, drop me a line in private email - no need to try the list with definitions of internal/external... Cat
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SUN.3.91.960424164323.5667g-100000>