Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 00:28:41 +0200 From: Wilko Bulte <wkb@freebie.demon.nl> To: Motomichi Matsuzaki <mzaki@e-mail.ne.jp> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "make release" breakage - dokern.sh patch 2 Message-ID: <20001025002841.A2457@freebie.demon.nl> In-Reply-To: <86zojudnr5.wl@tkc.att.ne.jp>; from mzaki@e-mail.ne.jp on Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 04:48:14AM %2B0900 References: <20001024143644.A52958@bsdwins.com> <20001024121509.I17729@dragon.nuxi.com> <86zojudnr5.wl@tkc.att.ne.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 04:48:14AM +0900, Motomichi Matsuzaki wrote: > > Hi. > > At Tue, 24 Oct 2000 12:15:09 -0700, > David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > > Other candidates I've been pointed to include the removal of > > > /boot/boot[12] and NFS > > IMO NFS needs to stay. It is *very* useful to many (including me). > > I vote for 'remove NFS away'. > > Yes, there are many people using NFS install, but it is site-specific. The same argument goes for IPV6. In other words: it all depends on your viewpoint. > IMHO, making install-floppies should be more easy. Yes!!! -- Wilko Bulte Arnhem, the Netherlands wilko@freebsd.org http://www.freebsd.org http://www.nlfug.nl To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001025002841.A2457>