From owner-freebsd-current Fri Mar 29 07:04:46 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id HAA23011 for current-outgoing; Fri, 29 Mar 1996 07:04:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu (halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu [18.26.0.159]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id HAA22997 for ; Fri, 29 Mar 1996 07:04:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu; (5.65/1.1.8.2/19Aug95-0530PM) id AA10038; Fri, 29 Mar 1996 10:04:24 -0500 Date: Fri, 29 Mar 1996 10:04:24 -0500 From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <9603291504.AA10038@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> To: Steven Wallace Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: We need to do another XFree86 release for -current someday soon.. In-Reply-To: <199603290211.SAA06536@newport.ece.uci.edu> References: <26399.828045200@time.cdrom.com> <199603290211.SAA06536@newport.ece.uci.edu> Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk < said: > Yeah, that's one reason why I hate bumping the major version. > Why do ns_addr() and iso_addr() have to go? What's the big deal? Because the network address families they supported are no longer shipped, and thus they won't compile any more. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | Shashish is simple, it's discreet, it's brief. ... wollman@lcs.mit.edu | Shashish is the bonding of hearts in spite of distance. Opinions not those of| It is a bond more powerful than absence. We like people MIT, LCS, ANA, or NSA| who like Shashish. - Claude McKenzie + Florent Vollant