From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Fri Mar 4 14:22:33 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7952F9DACC2 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 14:22:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brooks@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: from spindle.one-eyed-alien.net (spindle.one-eyed-alien.net [199.48.129.229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AE031EE for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 14:22:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brooks@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: by spindle.one-eyed-alien.net (Postfix, from userid 3001) id B57A05A9F27; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 14:22:26 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 14:22:26 +0000 From: Brooks Davis To: kpneal@pobox.com Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Newer clang than comes with install? Message-ID: <20160304142226.GC39399@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> References: <20160303134505.GB26990@neutralgood.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="61jdw2sOBCFtR2d/" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160303134505.GB26990@neutralgood.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2016 14:22:33 -0000 --61jdw2sOBCFtR2d/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 08:45:05AM -0500, kpneal@pobox.com wrote: > I notice on 10.2 we're using "FreeBSD clang version 3.4.1". But there are > bugs in this version of clang that I'm having trouble with. >=20 > Is compiling a newer (say, 3.7.1) version of clang to target FreeBSD > supported? I have no desire to replace any of the libraries, just the > compiler itself. Is that supposed to work _without_ going through the > ports/pkgs system? >=20 > IOW, can I just download from llvm.org the clang+llvm source, compile > it on FreeBSD, and then use it safely? It should. The ports don't include many patches. -- Brooks --61jdw2sOBCFtR2d/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJW2ZoiAAoJEKzQXbSebgfAD9AIAI1446JxthmjDbOFcXJNu7dx GKcDFp2TUinX4NYqKO1l4TNoBUi1ONp1fek45/4KgiJgLHl8Vb/aze3RvbQL9Etj dBm0f1ehhbcUXoqa84BdAZek9Zyvf63vIQX/fMqWGBUA1Galoo60TSit+HMZOgfj A98higmMXWmufiQc8fy53Oq8X3kFJczNxt0hEWbcX9NBb9jx6qArlyypKaNAuPkX PhpWruqtqTKXfQZXjTSlkg+k3EgWRPIUgezNGGmDyqB9QfQpc21faDabyvPELyJa JN7SVyySHyiymw6SkiUKoweTTYXH+NirL1JwSJGAQZKvacDM+OK3wwde6otefJg= =A2ik -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --61jdw2sOBCFtR2d/--