From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Sep 25 00:32:47 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id AAA02585 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 25 Sep 1997 00:32:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usr03.primenet.com (tlambert@usr03.primenet.com [206.165.6.203]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA02578 for ; Thu, 25 Sep 1997 00:32:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from tlambert@localhost) by usr03.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id AAA10186; Thu, 25 Sep 1997 00:32:41 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199709250732.AAA10186@usr03.primenet.com> Subject: Re: r-cmds and DNS and /etc/host.conf To: sef@Kithrup.COM (Sean Eric Fagan) Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 07:32:40 +0000 (GMT) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199709250239.TAA06463@kithrup.com> from "Sean Eric Fagan" at Sep 24, 97 07:39:46 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > I started up two tcpdump's on garth (one for lo0, and one for "host garth > and not port login and not port klogin" on de0). > > Then, from kithrup, I did: > > rlogin -KL8 garth > > No traffic from either tcpdump. > > I verified that iruserok() is the same for -current and garth's version. > > So I'm afraid I still can't reproduce it, although I am trying. Any > suggestions to changes to make to my setup (other than installing a newer > version of the OS :))? One thing that occurs to me is that I'm using the recommended: set ifaddr 10.10.10.10/0 10.10.11.11/0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 in ppp.conf, but I'm using a class B (192.168.0.0 - 192.168.255.255) instead of a class A (10.0.0.0 - 10.255.255.255) non-routable network as my local network. This shouldn't have this effect, but ...who knows. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.