From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 5 05:35:36 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 993EB16A4CE for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2003 05:35:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F10C43FBF for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2003 05:35:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666) id 871B1530C; Fri, 5 Dec 2003 14:35:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP id F014A5308 for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2003 14:35:26 +0100 (CET) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 888B333C6A; Fri, 5 Dec 2003 14:35:26 +0100 (CET) To: doc@freebsd.org From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 14:35:26 +0100 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090024 (Oort Gnus v0.24) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on flood.des.no X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60 Subject: doc / doc-bugs split? X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 13:35:36 -0000 How would people feel about splitting -doc into -doc and -doc-bugs like the ports people did with -ports? Since I'm mainly a src committer and my time and resources are limited, I'd like to be able to keep track of infrastructure discussions without having to wade through bug reports. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no