From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 21:01:50 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63EF51065670 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2008 21:01:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danallen46@airwired.net) Received: from mail.utahbroadband.com (mail.utahbroadband.com [204.14.20.91]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26AA28FC2E for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2008 21:01:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danallen46@airwired.net) Received: (qmail 4329 invoked by uid 89); 3 Sep 2008 20:28:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.16?) (danallen46@airwired.net@66.29.174.6) by 0 with ESMTPA; 3 Sep 2008 20:28:27 -0000 Message-Id: From: Dan Allen To: Guido Falsi In-Reply-To: <48BEEB55.4050406@madpilot.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v926) Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 15:01:48 -0600 References: <35445338-D597-4FE2-996F-DEC7BE986741@airwired.net> <48BEEB55.4050406@madpilot.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.926) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7.1 Content X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 21:01:50 -0000 On 3 Sep 2008, at 1:53 PM, Guido Falsi wrote: > If you just want na instant workstation, why you just don't try > Freesbie or something like that? Because I want something from the source -- from the main team -- and not something downstream. > If I install FreeBSD on a PC I expect this installation to live > there for some years. I can spend some hours/days installing and > configuring what I really need. At least this is the way I see it. > Maybe I'm misunderstanding you. I too spend the time. I am thinking that for other people to want to use FreeBSD they want something other than a command prompt. They at least want a web browser out of the box. The Ubuntu install is very compelling. I am just wishing that FreeBSD was AS compelling in its first install experience. At present it is far, far behind. That does not stop ME from preferring FreeBSD, but it stops many other people. Dan