From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 25 10:20:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B76C10656B0 for ; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 10:20:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 468458FC78 for ; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 10:20:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m3PAK5P1033529 for ; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 10:20:05 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.1/Submit) id m3PAK57B033528; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 10:20:05 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 10:20:05 GMT Message-Id: <200804251020.m3PAK57B033528@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: Subject: Re: kern/123053: [re] re(4) unsupported hardware revision X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Mark Linimon List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 10:20:05 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/123053; it has been noted by GNATS. From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/123053: [re] re(4) unsupported hardware revision Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 05:17:45 -0500 ----- Forwarded message from Eric F Crist ----- From: Eric F Crist To: linimon@FreeBSD.org Subject: kern/123053 Cc: freebsd-drivers@freebsd.org Andrey, I've applied the patch to a 7.0-RELEASE-p1 source tree and rebooted my system. The card comes UP ok, but shows the following when connected to a 100BaseT/ Full Duplex switch port: re0: flags=8802 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=9b ether 00:1f:c6:52:7b:80 media: Ethernet autoselect (10baseT/UTP ) status: active Once I've assigned an IP to the interface, however, it comes up correctly and seems to function just fine. Is there any load testing I should perform for you folks? re0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=9b ether 00:1f:c6:52:7b:80 inet 10.0.0.38 netmask 0xffff0000 broadcast 10.0.255.255 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active ----- Eric F Crist Secure Computing Networks ----- End forwarded message -----