From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 17:47:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D88C10656CB for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:47:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from giffunip@tutopia.com) Received: from web32701.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web32701.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.207.245]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DC37A8FC16 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:47:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from giffunip@tutopia.com) Received: (qmail 1408 invoked by uid 60001); 2 Feb 2009 17:47:28 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: lWDVZYkVM1magjcMj_zRhnrEhiGLTOhGS7hWcSJ.brN524bqmTDkV6Lc3Ae_O2YRcHTSJ._HEICK.tC5EVrr_eijJNZKt5EdcfobxYBI2wfHVgTZRp5itpNtpr8uytA9lPNG8J2h3CAHHsf.jv62rKYFViMIlakhBEZB0.2keM.t_g4O.lQaI.CGvnFBBoWOvaP.Web6PGtN8b9dVImWsia4Q_Bp Received: from [190.24.208.73] by web32701.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 09:47:28 PST X-RocketYMMF: giffunip X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.7.260.1 Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:47:28 -0800 (PST) From: "Pedro F. Giffuni" To: yanefbsd@gmail.com, chet.ramey@case.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <160891.1210.qm@web32701.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 18:14:15 +0000 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, drosih@rpi.edu Subject: GNU readline (was Re: Alternatives to gcc) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: giffunip@tutopia.com List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 17:47:29 -0000 (sorry that my mailer gives so much trouble) --- On Mon, 2/2/09, Chet Ramey wrote: > > It all depends on what features people choose to use in GNU's > > readline that makes it compatible or not with libedit. > > ...which means that it's not a drop-in readline replacement.=A0 And > here we are -- back where we started. We don't need a drop in replacement, we need a replacement that works well = enough for the base system.=20 Like in the other BSDs the ports/packaging system can continue carrying GNU= readline. Why go into all this trouble? GNU readline is part of an evil plot: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-not-lgpl.html Pedro.=0A=0A=0A