From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 2 14:48:49 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CD3D16A402 for ; Wed, 2 May 2007 14:48:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-current@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB12613C44B for ; Wed, 2 May 2007 14:48:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-current@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HjG8B-0003PV-Gz for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Wed, 02 May 2007 16:48:35 +0200 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 02 May 2007 16:48:35 +0200 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 02 May 2007 16:48:35 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 16:48:16 +0200 Lines: 39 Message-ID: References: <200705021453.20372.h.schmalzbauer@omnisec.de> <46389DED.5060509@freebsd.org> <200705021631.02167.h.schmalzbauer@omnisec.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig259696F0EE1C0912175D4F2E" X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20060911) In-Reply-To: <200705021631.02167.h.schmalzbauer@omnisec.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.2.0 Sender: news Subject: Re: gjournal + gmirror question X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 14:48:49 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig259696F0EE1C0912175D4F2E Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > Because it's a large fs with standard newfs parameters, so many inodes = to=20 > check... > Or does fsck recognize that it's a gjournaled UFS and skip unnessecarry= =20 > checks? > That's what my initinal interest was about. Judging from=20 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sbin/fsck_ffs/gjournal.c you=20 might be right, but I don't see it documented in man pages. IIRC Pawel=20 did at one time explain that fsck will only delete stale/unreferenced=20 inodes and so be quicker than usual. If you have the time for benchmarks, they would be appreciated :) --------------enig259696F0EE1C0912175D4F2E Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGOKS2ldnAQVacBcgRAh74AKDfEEsBDXXrdJRRdkC0H99oEZsJKgCfa1an +xKUDnA/joyWyIwCLgrwzuY= =a23c -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig259696F0EE1C0912175D4F2E--