Date: Wed, 23 Jul 1997 21:08:07 -0700 From: "M.R.Murphy" <mrm@Mole.ORG> To: imp@rover.village.org, msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, tom@uniserve.com Subject: Re: lpr/lpd changes Message-ID: <199707240408.VAA20696@meerkat.mole.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > No. The only behaviour that makes any sense is for lpd itself to exit > with a diagnostic if no printers are defined; there is no point in > trying to teach something else about a private configuration file. > Is this a good idea given the current defined behavior of lpc (say WRT start). I think it's not broke, and don't fix it :-) If somebody doesn't want to start lpd, let 'em decide not to do so and change their configuration files appropriately. -- Mike Murphy mrm@Mole.ORG +1 619 598 5874 Better is the enemy of Good
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199707240408.VAA20696>