Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 25 Mar 2013 06:10:15 -0500
From:      Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Vitaly Magerya <vmagerya@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: maintainer timeout for FreeBSD commiters
Message-ID:  <51503097.6060407@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <515024B0.7020807@gmail.com>
References:  <50017C97.3050200@filez.com> <CADLo83_a=qOqTgGQF%2BLSYyGDaJoT6B2vF9JGV=a2ZHRXRyR6Pw@mail.gmail.com> <CAL409KzKvGZofXuRhk4q2Y3pYGLwpODoboHOeh_OPKNMNAcJGQ@mail.gmail.com> <CADLo83-qVe4WSz83OYimwt%2BFWh6ojd8Tg8gREJfwpae7qU7Uiw@mail.gmail.com> <515024B0.7020807@gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
------enig2WEENTJPEIKEARFIGLSIF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 3/25/2013 5:19 AM, Vitaly Magerya wrote:
> On 2012-07-14 18:27, Chris Rees wrote:
>> On 14 July 2012 16:24, Vitaly Magerya <vmagerya@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> One problem (at least how it appears to me) is that when a PR gets
>>> automatically assigned to a maintainer who is also a committer, it is=

>>> not automatically unassigned if the person is missing for a few
>>> months, and other committers ignore the PR because it is already
>>> assigned.
>>>
>>> This only happened once to me, but it took 6 months for another
>>> committer to notice it. And that was pretty fast, comparing to, say
>>> ports/154456 [1], which is open since 2011-02.
>>>
>>> Is automatic unassignment possible?
>>
>> Technically yes, but it's highly undesirable.  You can feel free to
>> bring it up here if you think that's happened.
>=20
> Hi, everyone. Two of my PRs, ports/175223 [1] and ports/176701 [2], hav=
e
> been automatically assigned to committers, and both have reached
> maintainer timeout a while ago. Could someone unassign them, so other
> committers could take a look?
>=20
> Thanks in advance.
>=20
> (I still think this should be done automatically. I would prefer not to=

> bother everyone at ports@ for such things).
>=20
> [1] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dports/175223
> [2] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dports/176701

I've reset these PR to the pool so anyone can grab them now.

--=20
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
bdrewery@freenode/EFNet


------enig2WEENTJPEIKEARFIGLSIF
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=sqiS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

------enig2WEENTJPEIKEARFIGLSIF--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51503097.6060407>