From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 26 00:09:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F4BE16A41F for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 00:09:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brdavis@odin.ac.hmc.edu) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (Odin.AC.HMC.Edu [134.173.32.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A20FA43D49 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 00:09:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brdavis@odin.ac.hmc.edu) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j9Q09Xrt008186; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 17:09:33 -0700 Received: (from brdavis@localhost) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0/Submit) id j9Q09XXj008185; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 17:09:33 -0700 Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 17:09:33 -0700 From: Brooks Davis To: Kevin Oberman Message-ID: <20051026000933.GA23992@odin.ac.hmc.edu> References: <20051025232419.E00155D04@ptavv.es.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="liOOAslEiF7prFVr" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051025232419.E00155D04@ptavv.es.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=8.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on odin.ac.hmc.edu Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: On-going problems with new dhclient X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 00:09:42 -0000 --liOOAslEiF7prFVr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 04:24:19PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: > Brooks et. al., >=20 > I have just spent a miserable time fighting with the new dhclient. I am > currently working in Seattle getting a very large network ready for a bit > computer show next month. I have excellent signal strength and don't > ever see the association drop. But I keep loosing my address and long > before the lease expires. For a while I was seeing the address vanish > more than once a minute. Ack! >=20 > I assumed that dhclient was exiting, but then I did "ps -ax | grep > dhclient" and I discovered that I had a whole bunch of processes, half > [priv] and half not, all on the same interface. This looked rather > broken to me. I had "restarted" dhclient several times, so I suspect it > was not really exiting when the network died and the address went away. >=20 > I know that if_wi does not play nice with the 802.11 modem but I really > don't think this should be happening. It's rally annoying! >=20 > I don't see this on my home wireless, but I have seen it several times > while traveling. I see it occasionally at work. I've never seen more than two dhclients per interface so some weird edge case is being hit. I'm guessing the interface is thrashing between APs and that may be causing problems. What I really need is a trace of state transitions from the NIC. 80211watch and 80211debug in src/tools/tools/ath/ may be sufficent, though I'm not sure. If you can get me in, I'd be happy to come down and try to debug this myself since I live in Seattle. I'd certainly like my laptop to work when I'm trying to attend the show. :) -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --liOOAslEiF7prFVr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDXsk9XY6L6fI4GtQRArXtAJ90w8JJXAy0r5GWJLvymvzoCKyVXACfaasw EBOrfw7CmeeBk0e9u8OUGwA= =miK9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --liOOAslEiF7prFVr--