Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 23 Sep 1997 03:09:50 -0500 (EST)
From:      "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net>
To:        syssgm@dtir.qld.gov.au (Stephen McKay)
Cc:        phk@critter.freebsd.dk, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, syssgm@dtir.qld.gov.au
Subject:   Re: New timeout capability (was Re: cvs commit:....)
Message-ID:  <199709230809.DAA06787@dyson.iquest.net>
In-Reply-To: <199709230619.QAA20746@ogre.dtir.qld.gov.au> from Stephen McKay at "Sep 23, 97 04:19:00 pm"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Stephen McKay said:
> On Monday, 22nd September 1997, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> 
> >In message <199709221910.NAA02147@rocky.mt.sri.com>, Nate Williams writes:
> >
> >>Can you explain a bit more about your 'rover' setup, and how it's used?
> >
> >The "rover" in my lab is named after it's more adventurous namesake
> >on Mars...
> 
> [Fun workbench elided]
> 
> Sounds like an excellent setup!  Wow, hard facts!
> 
> >If you have a change you want tested, I should be able to give 
> >the result back to you in one or two days.  (I only ask in return
> >that I may publish the results in case I write a paper on this
> >experiment later on).
> 
> I've always wanted to know how much it costs to run with 4Kb file system
> blocks vs 8Kb or now even 16Kb.  Oh, and the real cost of various minfree
> percentages.  No obligation, of course, but you might be interested too...
> 
32K or even 64K should work :-).  With our upcoming dynamic buffer size
allocation, we could even do 256K? :-).

-- 
John
dyson@freebsd.org
jdyson@nc.com



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199709230809.DAA06787>