From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Sep 26 14:51:36 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F18F7106566B
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:51:35 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from zkolic@sbb.rs)
Received: from smtp9.sbb.rs (smtp9.sbb.rs [89.216.2.41])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 614908FC08
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:51:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mycenae (cable-178-148-104-240.dynamic.sbb.rs [178.148.104.240])
	by smtp9.sbb.rs (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id q8QEWw71032731;
	Wed, 26 Sep 2012 16:33:03 +0200
Received: by mycenae (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 1173D5C23; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 16:27:05 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 16:27:05 +0200
From: Zoran Kolic <zkolic@sbb.rs>
To: Kevin Oberman <kob6558@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20120926142705.GA1072@mycenae.sbb.rs>
References: <20120925154413.GA1234@mycenae.sbb.rs>
	<CAN6yY1s2K6ZdDU0tWQv13YMjuRk_PR5jdrovUxy1aFmAJkpzVg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAN6yY1s2K6ZdDU0tWQv13YMjuRk_PR5jdrovUxy1aFmAJkpzVg@mail.gmail.com>
X-SMTP-Vilter-Version: 1.3.2
X-SBB-Virus-Status: clean
X-SBB-Spam-Score: -0.8
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cx_lowest on 9
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:51:36 -0000

> No news on the schedule, but with 9.1 Beta, the code has finally been
> fixed to deal with several issues and the correct answer is:
> performance_cx_lowest="Cmax"
> economy_cx_lowest="Cmax"
> And, no, I don't recall where it is documented

Thanks for answer!
I found the thread regarding this topic. Just as you
said. This "Cmax" is somehow contraintuitive to me.
I'd expected "Cmin", but it is me, I assume.
Cannot recall when I was so nervous waiting release
in the branch.
Best regards

                             Zoran