From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed May 20 02:38:12 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 259612FC832 for ; Wed, 20 May 2020 02:38:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49RcPJ0BLtz4Y0s; Wed, 20 May 2020 02:38:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@freebsd.org) Received: from ssl.vmeta.jp (unknown [IPv6:2405:6586:2280:1200:d5c8:bcfd:f46c:53ed]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: meta/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0A37C30ED8; Wed, 20 May 2020 02:38:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@freebsd.org) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 11:38:07 +0900 From: Koichiro Iwao To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recommendation softether In-Reply-To: <8020de39-c276-543e-cc65-bec1844a611d@protected-networks.net> References: <20200515215019.GA26925@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> <8020de39-c276-543e-cc65-bec1844a611d@protected-networks.net> User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4.3 Message-ID: X-Sender: meta@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 02:38:12 -0000 On 2020-05-16 07:52, Michael Butler via freebsd-ports wrote: > It's already there .. > > security/softether-devel Softether VPN 4 (stable beta version) > security/softether SoftEther VPN 4 (RTM version) > security/softether5 SoftEther VPN 5 (Developer Edition) Yup, I do maintain these. I'm also contributing to SoftEther upstream. Each of them works well on FreeBSD but if you want to run SoftEther on architectures other than x86(-64) such as Raspberry Pi, security/softether5 is the only version that supports such architectures. Rgds, -- meta