From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 22 16:12:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98A1916A4CE; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:12:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cheer.mahoroba.org (flets20-147.kamome.or.jp [218.45.20.147]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CE8043D2D; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:12:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ume@FreeBSD.org) Received: from lyrics.mahoroba.org (IDENT:U7n2maFWK06t2YbLEiZTLpcKLNXsVDAYopZeDOJU/Yfm3xDhc9rSh2z+H5iiyVpj@lyrics.mahoroba.org [IPv6:3ffe:501:185b:8010:280:88ff:fe03:4841]) (user=ume mech=CRAM-MD5 bits=0)i5MGC99T031476 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 23 Jun 2004 01:12:10 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from ume@FreeBSD.org) Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 01:12:09 +0900 Message-ID: From: Hajimu UMEMOTO To: Bruce M Simpson In-Reply-To: <20040622153207.GB1961@empiric.dek.spc.org> References: <20040622153207.GB1961@empiric.dek.spc.org> User-Agent: xcite1.38> Wanderlust/2.11.3 (Wonderwall) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.6 (Marutamachi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.3 (i386--freebsd) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on cheer.mahoroba.org cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org cc: dwmalone@FreeBSD.org cc: wietse@porcupine.org cc: fenner@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: tcp_wrappers: accumulated change-request PRs X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:12:36 -0000 Hi, >>>>> On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:32:07 +0100 >>>>> Bruce M Simpson said: bms> Whilst scanning GNATS, I found a number of PRs relating to requests bms> for tcp_wrappers functionality and some outright bugfixes. Rather than bms> commit these as-is, I think we should push the changes back to Wietse, bms> as we maintain tcp_wrappers on a vendor branch. bms> The PRs in question are: bms> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/31034 bms> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/32808 bms> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=misc/36556 bms> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=misc/42336 bms> What does everyone else think? Many part of our code is already off a vender branch since IPv6 support, and it seems Wietse doesn't maintain tcp_wrappers actively. So, I think it is better to integrate tcp_wrappers into our tree rather than maintaining it in contrib like NetBSD does. Sincerely, -- Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan ume@mahoroba.org ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org http://www.imasy.org/~ume/