From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 14 14:45:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D89F41065691 for ; Fri, 14 May 2010 14:45:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uqs@spoerlein.net) Received: from acme.spoerlein.net (acme.spoerlein.net [IPv6:2001:470:9a47::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70BF68FC08 for ; Fri, 14 May 2010 14:45:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from acme.spoerlein.net (localhost.spoerlein.net [IPv6:::1]) by acme.spoerlein.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o4EEjEdu043583 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 14 May 2010 16:45:14 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from uqs@spoerlein.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=spoerlein.net; s=dkim200908; t=1273848314; bh=ENUVzTiy6jeNENo0+AgTDY0AWcxkFGz0hxovw9VXnqU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:In-Reply-To; b=tS7nPf6I8BJqA9GQuSyUW+PQioh2EKe2/o7upTltTLX+l/SvrSxf5RfEIDTwK1xsw EktFYVVinpx17jmR+3XcoNYBpNH7mGX9Yi5xohNUsy+HPpiLbfq6uRojtJk8LYR22h umjZyNRJOp40fj+sIFgCM3ORHEOUjUvGqfDWWlJg= Received: (from uqs@localhost) by acme.spoerlein.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o4EEjEZg043552; Fri, 14 May 2010 16:45:14 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from uqs@spoerlein.net) Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 16:45:14 +0200 From: Ulrich =?utf-8?B?U3DDtnJsZWlu?= To: Pete French Message-ID: <20100514144513.GK88504@acme.spoerlein.net> Mail-Followup-To: Pete French , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Any chance of someone commiting the patch in bin/131861 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 14:45:15 -0000 On Fri, 14.05.2010 at 10:17:23 +0100, Pete French wrote: > > > Postfix will re-write this as part of sanitization, so I had to revert > > to creating mbox files by hand. Anyway, could you please test the > > following patch with a wider variety of mails? > > I've been testing your patch for a few weeks now as my main email > client, and I havent encountered any problems - it also does fix > the reply issues I was originally having. Do you want to attach it > to the PR ? After that maybe someone could commit it - I am pretty > certain it doesnt actualy break any exising behaviour. > > cheers, > > -pete. I'll try to get review by some fellow FreeBSD dev that is more familiar with our mail(1) history and then commit the changed eventually. Do you feel strongly about merging the fix to 8 or 7 or both? Regards, Uli