From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Oct 11 16:28:57 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D74ACE91;
 Sat, 11 Oct 2014 16:28:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90B48AB6;
 Sat, 11 Oct 2014 16:28:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD))
 (envelope-from <lists@opsec.eu>)
 id 1XczXN-000KPX-Et; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 18:28:57 +0200
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 18:28:57 +0200
From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>
To: Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org,
 mat@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: print/muttprint
Message-ID: <20141011162857.GJ29437@home.opsec.eu>
References: <20141011114310.GA4035@unixarea.DDR.dd>
 <20141011115119.GI29437@home.opsec.eu>
 <20141011152016.GA78035@home.opsec.eu>
 <20141011153949.GA5022@unixarea.DDR.dd>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20141011153949.GA5022@unixarea.DDR.dd>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 16:28:57 -0000

Hi!

> > mat@ mailed that
> > 
> > USE_TEX=latex dvipsk
> > 
> > should be used instead of the two additional run_deps.
> 
> A side note:
> 
> bapt switched from 'latex' to texlive:
[...]

> > Can you test if this works in your use-case and report the results ?

Btw, what is your use-case ?

How do you invoke muttprint and what does it call and what does it do
in the end ? Does it really generate a .ps to send to the printer ?

> > and yes, when you compile the port directly with
> 
> # make install
> 
> 'USE_TEX= texlive' pulls in
> Tex, but it does not if you compile the ports with poudriere.

I'm surprised that USE_TEX=texlive in poudriere does not pull it in.
Can you provide a build log to show this ?

> I brought
> this question up in freebsd-pkg@ but did not got any comments on this.
> 
> I can revoke the change in my VM / poudriere and send in a complete log
> of the compilation of print/muttprint if someone is willing to dig into.

Yes, please.

> For the moment, I have not found any other solution as the two
> additional lines.

Well, if it solves your problem, then it's definitly a good sign 8-)

-- 
pi@opsec.eu            +49 171 3101372                         6 years to go !