From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 23 04:49:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2382106566B for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 04:49:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.allbsd.org (gatekeeper-int.allbsd.org [IPv6:2001:2f0:104:e002::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 068C88FC12 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 04:49:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alph.allbsd.org ([IPv6:2001:2f0:104:e010:862b:2bff:febc:8956]) (authenticated bits=128) by mail.allbsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q0N4mlcc007836; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 13:48:57 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) (authenticated bits=0) by alph.allbsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q0N4mig2061276; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 13:48:45 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 13:48:36 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20120123.134836.1135493075127784763.hrs@allbsd.org> To: sem@semmy.ru, bra@fsn.hu, kes-kes@yandex.ru From: Hiroki Sato In-Reply-To: <4F196D64.6020508@semmy.ru> References: <4F190F3F.7050302@fsn.hu> <4F196D64.6020508@semmy.ru> X-PGPkey-fingerprint: BDB3 443F A5DD B3D0 A530 FFD7 4F2C D3D8 2793 CF2D X-Mailer: Mew version 6.4 on Emacs 23.3 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="--Security_Multipart(Mon_Jan_23_13_48_36_2012_481)--" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97 at gatekeeper.allbsd.org X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (mail.allbsd.org [IPv6:2001:2f0:104:e001::32]); Mon, 23 Jan 2012 13:49:02 +0900 (JST) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.4 required=13.0 tests=BAYES_00, CONTENT_TYPE_PRESENT, FSL_RU_URL, RDNS_NONE, SPF_SOFTFAIL, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on gatekeeper.allbsd.org Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Adding setfib support to rc.d/routing X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 04:49:04 -0000 ----Security_Multipart(Mon_Jan_23_13_48_36_2012_481)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sergey Matveychuk wrote in <4F196D64.6020508@semmy.ru>: se> 20.01.2012 10:52, Attila Nagy wrote: se> > Hi, se> > se> > Having multiple routing tables is a very nice and (was a) long awaited se> > capability in FreeBSD. Having it since years is even more cool, se> > because se> > we can assume it's stable now. se> > But not having infrastructure support for it sucks, this makes people se> > hacking with rc.local or various scripts in various places. se> > se> > There is a(t least one) PR about it: conf/145440, which proposes a se> > standard method for setting up different FIBs in a seems to be logical se> > way, which is compatible with the current single routing table method se> > of se> > static_routes. se> > se> > Are there any objections about this PR? Is there something we can do se> > to se> > get it committed? se> > se> se> se> JFYI conf/132476 I'll take a look at these patches and try to merge. -- Hiroki ----Security_Multipart(Mon_Jan_23_13_48_36_2012_481)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAk8c5qQACgkQTyzT2CeTzy1n2wCeIR5YsSJTwnpbbeyNRKa9eN8F HXMAn3iyQrdydRwO+0nYE+ba0quM7Zek =Cr6V -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Mon_Jan_23_13_48_36_2012_481)----