Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 12:17:45 +0200 From: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> To: Pawel Worach <pawel.worach@gmail.com> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org, "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Subject: Re: Clang: now available from a SVN server near you! Message-ID: <20090609101745.GE48776@hoeg.nl> In-Reply-To: <d227e09e0906081346j3ee7822n24c1c4968088647d@mail.gmail.com> References: <20090604093831.GE48776@hoeg.nl> <20090608.120552.756910862.imp@bsdimp.com> <d227e09e0906081346j3ee7822n24c1c4968088647d@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--oCUf59kop2Azht1W Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * Pawel Worach <pawel.worach@gmail.com> wrote: > So runtime performance is on par with gcc, code size is a bit bigger > so there is still room for optimization in LLVM. I don't agree on the code size. Code size is comparable. I just did a quick ls through /bin. There also seem to be a lot of cases where Clang generates smaller binaries. Some time ago the binaries were indeed a lot bigger, but that turned out to be a bug in Clang, where a compiler flag had a wrong default value, namely the flag that determined whether zero-initialized data had to go in BSS or not. --=20 Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> WWW: http://80386.nl/ --oCUf59kop2Azht1W Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkouNsgACgkQ52SDGA2eCwVHnACfaoxEg9nNU0BZjv73sqUq+mfv ICsAn0mcRhQ/YZrevzPRcgtx8pDJyvnK =IZ0p -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --oCUf59kop2Azht1W--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090609101745.GE48776>