From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 8 19:36:16 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7520B399 for ; Wed, 8 Apr 2015 19:36:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from m.saper.info (m.saper.info [IPv6:2a01:4f8:a0:7383::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "m.saper.info", Issuer "Marcin Cieslak 2011" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09B02D5A for ; Wed, 8 Apr 2015 19:36:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from m.saper.info (saper@m.saper.info [IPv6:2a01:4f8:a0:7383::]) by m.saper.info (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t38JaDVO034938 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 8 Apr 2015 19:36:13 GMT (envelope-from saper@saper.info) Received: from localhost (saper@localhost) by m.saper.info (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id t38JaC4e034935; Wed, 8 Apr 2015 19:36:13 GMT (envelope-from saper@saper.info) X-Authentication-Warning: m.saper.info: saper owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 19:36:12 +0000 From: Marcin Cieslak To: Ryan Stone Subject: Re: Dual booting FreeBSD and Win95 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: FreeBSD Current X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 19:36:16 -0000 On Wed, 8 Apr 2015, Ryan Stone wrote: > No, this isn't a late April Fools joke. :( > > > We've discussed just switching hard drives, but we really want to shoot for > a 100% automated process. Anybody have any ideas? I guess due to hardware interfacing virtualization is not an option? I've seen some testing equipment running Win98 only because it allows direct access to serial ports, not exposing some kind of virtual device driver. //arcin