From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 8 01:55:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43B2D1065695; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 01:55:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 172-17-150-251.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BADD14F3F5; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 01:55:09 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F31D5F3.8020401@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:54:59 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120201 Thunderbird/10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Philip M. Gollucci" References: <4F31D347.9060509@FreeBSD.org> <4F31D475.3030307@FreeBSD.org> <4F31D4DA.9040007@p6m7g8.com> In-Reply-To: <4F31D4DA.9040007@p6m7g8.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig8BD28664EE7591C79C79D3DC" Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Michael Scheidell Subject: Re: helping out INDEX builds. best practices? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 01:55:10 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig8BD28664EE7591C79C79D3DC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 02/07/2012 17:50, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > On 02/08/12 01:48, Doug Barton wrote: >> On 02/07/2012 17:43, Michael Scheidell wrote: >>> if a certain port needs to be kept in sync with another portversion, >>> other than putting a comment in the main port "# must bump portversio= n >>> in port..." where you have two maintainers, is there a better way to = do >>> this? >> >> Take a look at editors/xxe and editors/xml2rfc-xxe >=20 > devel/py-subversion might be a better example since it includes > Makefile.common specifically from subversion. Yes, that's exactly the same mechanism used in xml2rfc-xxe. The only difference is that it's not a slave port. Doug --=20 It's always a long day; 86400 doesn't fit into a short. Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/ --------------enig8BD28664EE7591C79C79D3DC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJPMdX8AAoJEFzGhvEaGryEUlUH/0bNZOEciEmYttbVJkSJYJ+6 1wvVTBX6Eio6bV0clBPmIeHORDXTiFLhhQ0C/rgBl/GK9wbcqNbwmtY+DPsJtl4L nkL0alMji26p8uRP6zR3NJnQ+dNBu1jivY/0CKACkp1oE9yvTZh3zVXaREQ7E90X kSTaafGR8YeqSzr6jPmPr2d5cOGqStBMreq8a1XIz2ORHJcl9Jgc/G0nBho9qroh R87ZhQDmQ1TNbXDGwfs7FP6AoOLdNpfbDGen2855R5YCalhmr59pgouNVif1heEU as84Czo7daj/NcoeCc2wIyi953MgWxudDbd5BEvlUwnuns8u/czgT2RLjoxxraA= =3sFJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig8BD28664EE7591C79C79D3DC--