From owner-freebsd-ports Sun May 20 6:40: 6 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3808B37B422 for ; Sun, 20 May 2001 06:40:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f4KDe3H05586; Sun, 20 May 2001 06:40:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 06:40:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200105201340.f4KDe3H05586@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Will Andrews Subject: Re: ports/26926: (NEW PORT) osg - Open Scene Graph Reply-To: Will Andrews Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/26926; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Will Andrews To: Randall Hopper Cc: Will Andrews , FreeBSD GNATS DB Subject: Re: ports/26926: (NEW PORT) osg - Open Scene Graph Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 08:27:42 -0500 On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 09:20:10AM -0400, Randall Hopper wrote: > It's an editor-related thing. Emacs for example has no problem creating > files that don't end with EOL (I edit binary files in Emacs on occasion > because it doesn't insert characters that I don't tell it to). vi on the > other hand seems to prefer adding EOL at EOF. I've used both vi & vim, and never had problems with either in this aspect. But then again, I don't edit binary files... -- wca To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message