Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 12:38:23 +0100 From: RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ufs snapshot help Message-ID: <20150424123823.1f02c665@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <65468.128.135.70.2.1429815636.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> References: <CAKE2PDuSGsrf7mHfd2zo-BJAhsOL4KDKTmdROBwtJKeFrvWCBw@mail.gmail.com> <CAKoxK%2B7brXXBE=JxPQHm06a2SEMiGC7k3eF95o7aQ90Hi__3Fg@mail.gmail.com> <CAKE2PDudJ57mWhPKU7XhEz85QG1Gywxt8U=sW1i7T6Nf269h3g@mail.gmail.com> <mhbe4v$gd3$1@ger.gmane.org> <65468.128.135.70.2.1429815636.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 23 Apr 2015 14:00:36 -0500 (CDT) Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > Once (a while ago) I noticed Linuxes have started in addition to /tmp > using /var/tmp, FreeBSD has always had /var/tmp. It's perfectly sensible, file in /tmp don't need to survive a reboot, those in /var/tmp do. > and yet even worse /usr/tmp. What a brain dead > decision! It always is regretful when one sees "Linuxisms" creeping > in into better systems like FreeBSD ;-(
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150424123823.1f02c665>