From owner-freebsd-current Sat May 31 10:56:17 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA01409 for current-outgoing; Sat, 31 May 1997 10:56:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA01404 for ; Sat, 31 May 1997 10:56:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA08241; Sat, 31 May 1997 13:56:02 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 31 May 1997 13:56:02 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <199705311756.NAA08241@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) Cc: freebsd-current@freefall.FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: if.h inclusion of In-Reply-To: <19970531182404.ES51927@uriah.heep.sax.de> References: <199705301551.LAA01946@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <199705301601.SAA19086@gil.physik.rwth-aachen.de> <19970531182404.ES51927@uriah.heep.sax.de> Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk < As Christoph Kukulies wrote: >> > Then bisdn should properly include like every other >> > client of does. The former is a prerequisite for the >> > latter. >> >> OK, Hellmuth, Gary, have you read this? > BISDN does. It's only that we can't emit updated BISDN releases, as > you know. It's already cleaned up in the BISDN CVS tree. > It's however tangled inside some #ifdef spagghetti currently, and > needs further cleanup. > #if defined(__NetBSD__) || defined(__OpenBSD__) > #include > #include > #include > #endif > #if defined(__FreeBSD__) && __FreeBSD__>=3 > #include > #endif > #include > That's horrible. There is no reason for the include of to be conditional. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same wollman@lcs.mit.edu | O Siem / The fires of freedom Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA| - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick