From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 1 15:37:21 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBA5A16A4CE for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 15:37:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from stephanie.unixdaemons.com (stephanie.unixdaemons.com [67.18.111.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6638543D31 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 15:37:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bmilekic@technokratis.com) Received: from stephanie.unixdaemons.com (bmilekic@localhost.unixdaemons.com [127.0.0.1])j11FbI4i043571; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 10:37:18 -0500 (EST) Received: (from bmilekic@localhost) by stephanie.unixdaemons.com (8.13.2/8.12.1/Submit) id j11FbIOg043570; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 10:37:18 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from bmilekic@technokratis.com) X-Authentication-Warning: stephanie.unixdaemons.com: bmilekic set sender to bmilekic@technokratis.com using -f Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 10:37:18 -0500 From: Bosko Milekic To: Chris Message-ID: <20050201153718.GA43352@technokratis.com> References: <3aaaa3a0501060612502ce616@mail.gmail.com> <20050106223854.GA97444@technokratis.com> <3aaaa3a0501081243395726d2@mail.gmail.com> <20050121175219.GA9829@technokratis.com> <3aaaa3a050121124314b6d041@mail.gmail.com> <20050201031509.GA32624@technokratis.com> <3aaaa3a05020105184b175d4b@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3aaaa3a05020105184b175d4b@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mbufs on 5.3-STABLE possible bug X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 15:37:21 -0000 On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 01:18:38PM +0000, Chris wrote: > Sorry, yes have tried it, I am still seeing a negative perofrmance > difference with the setting on 0 but the gap is greatly reduced and > its something that is a lot more acceptable, at most it has been 10% > worse then if left on auto or set to a value. Let me know if there is > any specific types of tests you want doing. > > Chris I'm not sure I understand. Setting it to zero _means_ "auto." I'll likely commit the patch. Thanks. -- Bosko Milekic bmilekic@technokratis.com bmilekic@FreeBSD.org