Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 22 Apr 2003 07:37:24 +0400 (MSD)
From:      "."@babolo.ru
To:        Miguel Mendez <flynn@energyhq.homeip.net>
Cc:        Sergey Matveychuk <sem@ciam.ru>
Subject:   Re: [kris@freebsd.org: cvs commit: ports/Mk bsd.port.mk]
Message-ID:  <1050982644.340040.871.nullmailer@cicuta.babolo.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20030421130559.17950503.flynn@energyhq.homeip.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

Checking application/pgp-signature: FAILURE
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> On Mon, 21 Apr 2003 15:02:46 +0400
> "Sergey Matveychuk" <sem@ciam.ru> wrote:
> 
> Howdy,
> 
> > Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> > > Hm, execuse me my sarcasm, but do we really need the second
> > > portupgrade in C???
> > 
> > I see two main reasons:
> > 1) portupgrade is not in base system and never be there because of
> > ruby. 2) Because it is in ruby :)
> 
> I'd rather see cvsup implemented in a language from this universe :-P
ports/net/cvsync



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1050982644.340040.871.nullmailer>